There may be at the moment no broadly accepted take a look at technique to evaluate the security of second-life lithium-ion batteries (LiBs). Nevertheless, a UK authorities examine revealed two conflicting views on their security, elevating issues about whether or not such gadgets needs to be deployed in houses below any circumstances.
A UK authorities examine reveals conflicting views on the security of second-life EV batteries in house power storage purposes. Some stakeholders argue that an enabling framework is feasible, whereas others argue that the security of such gadgets “can by no means be assured.”
The impartial analysis report, “A Examine of the Security of Second Life Batteries in Battery Power Storage Techniques,” was commissioned by the UK Workplace for Product Security and Requirements (OPSS) and was carried out by lecturers at Newcastle College’s Faculty of Engineering.
As a part of the venture, the researchers consulted round 40 organizations and corporations, together with the worldwide security and certification group UL, main producers equivalent to Siemens and Varta, and automakers equivalent to Nissan and Jaguar. Whereas a number of of those stakeholders use second-life LiBs, principally for industrial purposes, “proof suggests that there’s restricted use in home methods,” in accordance with the report.
Nevertheless, the numerous discussions confirmed that many respondents believed {that a} security framework could possibly be put in place to permit using second-life LiB in house battery storage purposes, so long as the total historical past of batteries of their first life. purposes are identified and/or they are often examined successfully.
The second, extra radical view shared by some stakeholders is solely that the security of such cells can by no means be assured, “and due to this fact the second life LiBs shouldn’t be used below any circumstances in such purposes. “
In its concluding remarks, the report added that consideration also needs to be given as to if stricter necessities are wanted for home-built power storage methods that use second-life batteries.
That is defined by the lack of know-how about age-related failures and their results. In different phrases, whereas the dangers related to second-life LiBs are broadly comparable, the chance of failure could also be greater than the previous as a result of results of growing old and unknown stress, or abuse over time. in a LiB within the first life software.
Particularly, the capability lack of LiBs is usually thought of to be linear, with the end-of-life sometimes round 75% to 80% state of well being (SoH) and the ultimate stage end-of-life round 50% to 60%. SoH. Nevertheless, sooner or later a extreme and probably harmful deterioration can happen and result in an elevated fee of growing old. The time when this occurs, referred to as the “knee,” is troublesome to foretell. And this could happen at the next SoH than anticipated, rising the danger of thermal runaway, inside brief circuits, and joule heating, in accordance with the report.
The report goes on to say that there’s at the moment no broadly accepted take a look at technique to evaluate the security of second-life LiBs, leaving an enormous hole in worldwide requirements.
“At the moment it’s costly and labor intensive to check and take a look at end-of-life batteries as a consequence of a scarcity of standardization amongst EV OEMs,” OPSS mentioned. “Moreover, the declining price of latest LiBs signifies that the financial incentive for reuse and repurposing will likely be much less enticing.”
This content material is protected by copyright and might not be reused. If you wish to cooperate with us and need to reuse a few of our content material, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
