Scientists within the Netherlands have proposed an extension of the IEC 61853 normal on bifacial photo voltaic modules, with some necessary corrections. Specifically, they advocate altering the third and fourth components of the usual.
The researchers from Delft College of Expertise within the Netherlands tried to indicate that the IEC 61853 normal, which describes primary building necessities for PV modules, might be prolonged to the bifacial panel.
“Our job offers a complete technique for calculating the power score of bifacial modules and exhibits that, to make it suitable with the prevailing normal, the Local weather Particular Power Score (CSER) have to be normalized to the entrance aspect irradiation,” stated the researcher Malte Vogt. pv journal.
Vogt famous that IEC 61853 at present solely applies to monofacial panels. “Our paper is a step in updating the usual to additionally cowl bifacial modules, that are quickly growing their market share,” stated Vogt.
Specifically, scientists have proposed adjustments for the third a part of the IEC 61853 normal, which mixes module measurements and local weather information in an power yield and score calculation algorithm. Additionally they advocate adjustments for the fourth half, which defines reference climates with hourly illumination, temperature, wind pace, and angle of incidence information.
The Dutch group says that the local weather information from the fourth half might be expanded to acquire all of the irradiance values for the bifacial modules. They stated that within the third half, the power yield calculation algorithm ought to be adjusted for bifacial panel configurations.
The lecturers launched a brand new mannequin to calculate the rear irradiance and stated that its calculation ought to be carried out completely by creating the bifacial module power score information of the local weather and never of every consumer.
“It expands the local weather information from IEC 61853-4 to offer extra again irradiance parts required for bifacial modules,” they stated.
They divide the again irradiance (Mrr) into direct radiation, sky diffuse, and floor mirrored diffuse irradiance.
“Notice that we use the 20-degree tilt angle of the module to make the comparability of the power scores of the monofacial and bifacial module, as a result of the usual monofacial fixes the angle of 20 levels for all climates whatever the greatest tilt for the local weather, “Scientists say, noting that east-west oriented and vertical installations, in addition to methods with trackers, shouldn’t be thought of.
The researchers stated they maintained the IEC 61853 normal of 4 important calculation steps for monofacial panels, whereas correcting angular losses for the yield calculation algorithm.
“Opposite to the usual, we use it twice as soon as for the entrance and as soon as for the illumination of the again,” they defined, saying that they carried out the correction of the irradiance mirrored by the bottom, in addition to the spectral correction .
The staff examined the algorithm with two totally different strategies underneath actual outside circumstances over a nine-month interval. One of many two strategies provides the identical CSER worth for a bifaciality of zero because the monofacial module. One all the time provides a decrease CSER.
The scientists say their work consists of extending the rear-side angular correction for ground-reflected irradiance and mixing complete and efficient irradiance with temperature and energy calculation measures.
“Thus, comparatively easy calculation steps and no measurements, which haven’t been used for the entrance half, are added when increasing the bottom of bifacial modules,” they stated. They offered their findings in “Growing an power score for bifacial photovoltaic modules,” which was lately revealed in Advances in Photovoltaics.
This content material is protected by copyright and will not be reused. If you wish to cooperate with us and need to reuse a few of our content material, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
